Prof Gerry Breshears is back for his record breaking 3rd time on the show! In this episode we dive into the debate swirling around PSA (Penal Substitutionary Atonement) and ask Gerry all the hard questions!
In this episode we cover:
- What exactly is PSA, and why do so many Christians disagree about it?
- Can you defend PSA Biblically?
- What exactly happened on the Cross? What was the Trinity doing?
- Are the classic song lyrics correct? Did the Father turn his face away from Jesus on the Cross?
- Was Jesus forsaken on the Cross?
- Bonus: Which atonement theory does Gerry prefer?
- And: How can our understanding of the atonement impact our preaching to young people / postmoderns / deconstructionists?
Note from Aaron: The idea for this episode has been sitting in my brain for almost 7 years... back when I read a post from my friend and pastor Evan Wickham about his convo with Gerry about the atonement. The insights blew my mind then, and I hope they blow your mind now!
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit goodlionpod.substack.com
00:00:02 --> 00:00:03
00:00:03 --> 00:00:04
00:00:04 --> 00:00:05 I'm Aaron Salvato,
00:00:05 --> 00:00:07 and I'm here with the one,
00:00:07 --> 00:00:08 the only,
00:00:08 --> 00:00:08 the legendary,
00:00:09 --> 00:00:09 Gary Brashears.
00:00:10 --> 00:00:11
00:00:11 --> 00:00:14
00:00:15 --> 00:00:15
00:00:15 --> 00:00:22
00:00:23 --> 00:00:24
00:00:24 --> 00:00:25
00:00:25 --> 00:00:26
00:00:26 --> 00:00:28
00:00:28 --> 00:00:29
00:00:29 --> 00:00:30
00:00:30 --> 00:00:32
00:00:32 --> 00:00:35
00:00:36 --> 00:00:38
00:00:38 --> 00:00:39 Our first guest,
00:00:39 --> 00:00:42 very first guest to ever show up on the show three times.
00:00:42 --> 00:00:46
00:00:46 --> 00:00:49
00:00:49 --> 00:00:52
00:00:52 --> 00:00:56
00:00:56 --> 00:00:58
00:00:58 --> 00:00:58 Oh.
00:01:01 --> 00:01:04
00:01:04 --> 00:01:06
00:01:07 --> 00:01:09
00:01:10 --> 00:01:12 Gary Breshears has been a professor of theology at Western
00:01:12 --> 00:01:13 Seminary since 1980.
00:01:14 --> 00:01:17
00:01:17 --> 00:01:18
00:01:19 --> 00:01:21 He is an elder and a member of the preaching team at Grace
00:01:21 --> 00:01:23 Community Church in Oregon,
00:01:23 --> 00:01:25
00:01:26 --> 00:01:26
00:01:27 --> 00:01:27
00:01:27 --> 00:01:27
00:01:27 --> 00:01:28
00:01:28 --> 00:01:28
00:01:28 --> 00:01:29
00:01:29 --> 00:01:30
00:01:30 --> 00:01:32
00:01:32 --> 00:01:32
00:01:32 --> 00:01:33
00:01:33 --> 00:01:35
00:01:35 --> 00:01:36
00:01:36 --> 00:01:36
00:01:37 --> 00:01:37
00:01:37 --> 00:01:42
00:01:42 --> 00:01:43
00:01:43 --> 00:01:46
00:01:46 --> 00:01:49
00:01:49 --> 00:01:50
00:01:50 --> 00:01:53
00:01:54 --> 00:01:56
00:01:57 --> 00:01:57 Gary,
00:01:57 --> 00:02:01 can you give me some fatherly advice since I'm about to become
00:02:01 --> 00:02:01 a father?
00:02:01 --> 00:02:01
00:02:01 --> 00:02:05
00:02:06 --> 00:02:07
00:02:08 --> 00:02:10
00:02:10 --> 00:02:14
00:02:14 --> 00:02:15
00:02:15 --> 00:02:16
00:02:16 --> 00:02:16
00:02:16 --> 00:02:18
00:02:18 --> 00:02:19 But those love and structure,
00:02:19 --> 00:02:21 that basis is anyway,
00:02:21 --> 00:02:22 there's good books on parenting.
00:02:22 --> 00:02:26 We use we were doing parenting with love and logic before the
00:02:26 --> 00:02:27 book existed.
00:02:27 --> 00:02:29
00:02:30 --> 00:02:30
00:02:30 --> 00:02:31
00:02:31 --> 00:02:31
00:02:32 --> 00:02:32
00:02:32 --> 00:02:36
00:02:36 --> 00:02:37
00:02:37 --> 00:02:38
00:02:38 --> 00:02:38 So,
00:02:39 --> 00:02:39 Gary,
00:02:39 --> 00:02:42 are you ready to have a conversation about penal
00:02:42 --> 00:02:44 substitutionary atonement?
00:02:46 --> 00:02:47
00:02:47 --> 00:02:47
00:02:47 --> 00:02:48
00:02:48 --> 00:02:52 Getting some clarification on some of the brouhaha's going on
00:02:52 --> 00:02:52 in the Twittersphere
00:02:53 --> 00:02:53
00:02:54 --> 00:02:55
00:03:04 --> 00:03:06 So today we're going to talk a little bit about the debate
00:03:06 --> 00:03:07 around the theology of
00:03:08 --> 00:03:10
00:03:10 --> 00:03:11
00:03:11 --> 00:03:13
00:03:14 --> 00:03:14
00:03:14 --> 00:03:15
00:03:15 --> 00:03:16
00:03:17 --> 00:03:18
00:03:18 --> 00:03:19
00:03:19 --> 00:03:23
00:03:24 --> 00:03:26 I think there might be some people listening where they're like,
00:03:26 --> 00:03:27 what even is that?
00:03:27 --> 00:03:28
00:03:28 --> 00:03:30
00:03:30 --> 00:03:33
00:03:33 --> 00:03:35
00:03:35 --> 00:03:40 Atonement means there has to be some sort of work by God to
00:03:40 --> 00:03:41 enable those of us who
00:03:41 --> 00:03:43
00:03:43 --> 00:03:44
00:03:44 --> 00:03:46
00:03:47 --> 00:03:51
00:03:52 --> 00:03:52
00:03:52 --> 00:03:54
00:03:54 --> 00:03:56
00:03:57 --> 00:04:00 We're already in because He's a kind and loving God,
00:04:00 --> 00:04:01 and that is not correct.
00:04:01 --> 00:04:03
00:04:03 --> 00:04:07
00:04:07 --> 00:04:11
00:04:12 --> 00:04:14
00:04:15 --> 00:04:17
00:04:18 --> 00:04:21
00:04:21 --> 00:04:26 is that somehow there is a penalty associated with our betrayal
00:04:26 --> 00:04:27 of his relationship
00:04:27 --> 00:04:29
00:04:29 --> 00:04:32
00:04:33 --> 00:04:36 There is a penalty associated with violation of the honor code
00:04:36 --> 00:04:37 or the law code or
00:04:37 --> 00:04:38
00:04:39 --> 00:04:44 And so the key of substitution is there's a substitute who
00:04:44 --> 00:04:46 takes our penalty in our place.
00:04:47 --> 00:04:50
00:04:50 --> 00:04:54
00:04:54 --> 00:04:56
00:04:56 --> 00:04:57
00:04:58 --> 00:04:58
00:04:59 --> 00:05:03
00:05:03 --> 00:05:07
00:05:08 --> 00:05:11
00:05:12 --> 00:05:17 And so PSA is often the idea that the father who's angry at our
00:05:17 --> 00:05:19 sin pours that
00:05:19 --> 00:05:23
00:05:23 --> 00:05:25
00:05:25 --> 00:05:26
00:05:26 --> 00:05:27
00:05:28 --> 00:05:29
00:05:30 --> 00:05:30
00:05:31 --> 00:05:35 that somebody does the work for us rather than us have to do it ourselves.
00:05:35 --> 00:05:38
00:05:38 --> 00:05:42 and what it often means is the wrath of the Father goes on to
00:05:42 --> 00:05:43 the loving Son.
00:05:44 --> 00:05:46
00:05:47 --> 00:05:47
00:05:47 --> 00:05:48
00:05:48 --> 00:05:49
00:05:49 --> 00:05:52
00:05:52 --> 00:05:55
00:05:55 --> 00:05:58
00:05:58 --> 00:06:02 That the angry father who is angry simply because his justice
00:06:03 --> 00:06:04 makes him angry at
00:06:04 --> 00:06:07
00:06:08 --> 00:06:13 And the anger of the angry father is poured out on the loving
00:06:13 --> 00:06:14 son who loves us
00:06:14 --> 00:06:16
00:06:16 --> 00:06:18
00:06:18 --> 00:06:19 It's the horror of the cross,
00:06:20 --> 00:06:22 far worse than the physical or honor,
00:06:22 --> 00:06:22 shame,
00:06:22 --> 00:06:22 pain.
00:06:23 --> 00:06:24
00:06:24 --> 00:06:26
00:06:26 --> 00:06:26
00:06:26 --> 00:06:29
00:06:29 --> 00:06:33 the pastoral preaching in a church is going to emphasize
00:06:33 --> 00:06:35 different aspects of the
00:06:35 --> 00:06:36
00:06:37 --> 00:06:39
00:06:40 --> 00:06:43 Even if that church doesn't actually use terms like penal
00:06:43 --> 00:06:45 substitutionary atonement
00:06:45 --> 00:06:48
00:06:48 --> 00:06:50
00:06:50 --> 00:06:50
00:06:51 --> 00:06:53
00:06:53 --> 00:06:54
00:06:54 --> 00:07:00
00:07:00 --> 00:07:01
00:07:02 --> 00:07:02
00:07:03 --> 00:07:07
00:07:07 --> 00:07:10
00:07:10 --> 00:07:13
00:07:13 --> 00:07:15
00:07:15 --> 00:07:20 Not so much the emphasis on the angry God burning with wrath
00:07:20 --> 00:07:21 against humanity,
00:07:22 --> 00:07:25 but definitely the idea that God hated sin and that sin was
00:07:26 --> 00:07:27 deserving of punishment.
00:07:27 --> 00:07:30 So there was the emphasis on the sin,
00:07:30 --> 00:07:31 the need for punishment,
00:07:31 --> 00:07:32 Jesus paying the debt.
00:07:32 --> 00:07:36 I remember listening to Keith Green songs growing up and he had
00:07:36 --> 00:07:37 that one song.
00:07:37 --> 00:07:40
00:07:41 --> 00:07:42
00:07:42 --> 00:07:45
00:07:45 --> 00:07:48
00:07:48 --> 00:07:49
00:07:49 --> 00:07:50
00:07:50 --> 00:07:55
00:07:55 --> 00:07:56
00:07:56 --> 00:07:56
00:07:56 --> 00:07:56
00:08:21 --> 00:08:21 Okay,
00:08:21 --> 00:08:23 so when it comes to PSA,
00:08:23 --> 00:08:26 there's been a lot of debate on this topic over the years.
00:08:26 --> 00:08:26
00:08:27 --> 00:08:30 Some people really seem to hate the concept of the atonement
00:08:30 --> 00:08:31 looking this way.
00:08:31 --> 00:08:35 Some have likened the idea of God sending Jesus to die on the
00:08:35 --> 00:08:36 cross for our sins as
00:08:36 --> 00:08:38
00:08:38 --> 00:08:38
00:08:39 --> 00:08:39
00:08:39 --> 00:08:39
00:08:39 --> 00:08:40
00:08:40 --> 00:08:42
00:08:42 --> 00:08:42
00:08:42 --> 00:08:44
00:08:44 --> 00:08:44
00:08:44 --> 00:08:48
00:08:48 --> 00:08:50
00:08:50 --> 00:08:51
00:08:51 --> 00:08:54
00:08:54 --> 00:08:54
00:08:55 --> 00:08:56
00:08:56 --> 00:08:56
00:08:56 --> 00:08:57
00:08:57 --> 00:09:00 I could understand where the critics are coming from in saying
00:09:00 --> 00:09:01 that PSA does not
00:09:01 --> 00:09:04
00:09:04 --> 00:09:06
00:09:06 --> 00:09:07
00:09:07 --> 00:09:08
00:09:08 --> 00:09:09
00:09:09 --> 00:09:09
00:09:09 --> 00:09:15 If it's if this is the father forcing the son to come and get killed,
00:09:15 --> 00:09:16 that is child abuse.
00:09:16 --> 00:09:17
00:09:17 --> 00:09:19
00:09:20 --> 00:09:23
00:09:23 --> 00:09:25
00:09:26 --> 00:09:31
00:09:32 --> 00:09:35
00:09:35 --> 00:09:39
00:09:40 --> 00:09:40
00:09:40 --> 00:09:41
00:09:41 --> 00:09:45
00:09:45 --> 00:09:50 I love that you're pointing out the reality of how easy it is
00:09:50 --> 00:09:51 to get this wrong and
00:09:51 --> 00:09:53
00:09:54 --> 00:09:57
00:09:57 --> 00:09:58
00:09:58 --> 00:10:01
00:10:01 --> 00:10:02
00:10:02 --> 00:10:05
00:10:06 --> 00:10:09 And that that characterization is a gross misrepresentation of
00:10:09 --> 00:10:11 both God's heart and
00:10:11 --> 00:10:13
00:10:13 --> 00:10:18 So I want to give a little bit of time to you to have you set
00:10:18 --> 00:10:19 up this debate.
00:10:19 --> 00:10:22
00:10:23 --> 00:10:25
00:10:25 --> 00:10:28
00:10:28 --> 00:10:32
00:10:32 --> 00:10:32
00:10:33 --> 00:10:36
00:10:37 --> 00:10:38
00:10:38 --> 00:10:40
00:10:40 --> 00:10:41
00:10:41 --> 00:10:44
00:10:44 --> 00:10:45
00:10:46 --> 00:10:49 So it's people who are actually against the idea of
00:10:49 --> 00:10:51 substitution of any kind,
00:10:52 --> 00:10:55
00:10:55 --> 00:10:55
00:10:56 --> 00:10:58
00:10:58 --> 00:11:01 And it's actually what you see in a lot of the critical theory
00:11:01 --> 00:11:02 discussions about
00:11:02 --> 00:11:06
00:11:06 --> 00:11:08
00:11:08 --> 00:11:09
00:11:09 --> 00:11:10
00:11:10 --> 00:11:12
00:11:12 --> 00:11:13
00:11:13 --> 00:11:18
00:11:18 --> 00:11:19
00:11:19 --> 00:11:22 You're speaking from the perspective of those who have an
00:11:22 --> 00:11:24 aversion to the penal form of justice.
00:11:25 --> 00:11:26
00:11:26 --> 00:11:30 And so we should do is recognize that the criminal has been
00:11:30 --> 00:11:32 abused and hurt people,
00:11:32 --> 00:11:33 hurt people.
00:11:33 --> 00:11:36
00:11:36 --> 00:11:40 We need to do psychologists and such to help the abused person
00:11:41 --> 00:11:42 heal so he won't
00:11:42 --> 00:11:43
00:11:44 --> 00:11:45
00:11:45 --> 00:11:46
00:11:47 --> 00:11:51 It's the same thing that drives criminal reform is we the idea
00:11:51 --> 00:11:52 that we actually
00:11:52 --> 00:11:56 have done some things deserving of some sort of a penalty is
00:11:56 --> 00:11:57 the underlying touch point.
00:11:58 --> 00:12:00
00:12:00 --> 00:12:01
00:12:01 --> 00:12:01
00:12:01 --> 00:12:06 This this idea that people should not be punished for their
00:12:06 --> 00:12:07 crimes or for their sins,
00:12:07 --> 00:12:08
00:12:08 --> 00:12:11
00:12:11 --> 00:12:12
00:12:12 --> 00:12:13
00:12:13 --> 00:12:14
00:12:14 --> 00:12:16
00:12:16 --> 00:12:16
00:12:17 --> 00:12:18
00:12:18 --> 00:12:21
00:12:21 --> 00:12:22
00:12:23 --> 00:12:26
00:12:26 --> 00:12:30 And the critical theory stuff and police reform in the sense
00:12:30 --> 00:12:31 we're doing it now is
00:12:31 --> 00:12:32
00:12:32 --> 00:12:33
00:12:33 --> 00:12:38
00:12:39 --> 00:12:41 that we need to recognize these are good people who have been
00:12:41 --> 00:12:43 messed up by culture
00:12:43 --> 00:12:45
00:12:45 --> 00:12:49 It's actually Rousseau in the romantic enlightenment that's
00:12:49 --> 00:12:50 really taken on a new form.
00:12:51 --> 00:12:53
00:12:54 --> 00:12:55
00:12:55 --> 00:12:58
00:12:58 --> 00:13:01
00:13:01 --> 00:13:03
00:13:04 --> 00:13:05
00:13:05 --> 00:13:06
00:13:06 --> 00:13:07
00:13:07 --> 00:13:09
00:13:09 --> 00:13:13
00:13:13 --> 00:13:13



